Local execution
Run a command or script and return a focused result while preserving output for later lookup.
Context Mode keeps large tool outputs in a local SQLite index so a coding agent can retrieve the relevant lines instead of reading the entire result.
Design a local evidence workflow that returns the failing test and related lines while keeping the full log available.
Describe the command, log size and the errors you need to preserve.
Copy the request into a new Floatboat conversation and provide the required material.
Download FloatboatPreview and copy the request. It is not sent automatically from this page.
Reference: Context Mode https://github.com/mksglu/context-mode Read the original documentation and check the current environment and dependencies. Propose any new installation or tool connection before proceeding. My task: Study Context Mode’s local indexing pattern. Given a test log, propose how to return failures by test name and retrieve supporting stack lines. Compare the evidence with the raw log and show how I can measure context usage. Expected deliverable: A log-indexing plan with retrieval examples and a check that the excerpts preserve the failure evidence.
A full test log can fill an agent’s context while the useful evidence occupies only a few lines. Context Mode runs work in its local execution environment, keeps results in a SQLite FTS5 index and returns focused results or search excerpts.
MCP provides the tool interface. Host hooks and rules can steer compatible agents toward those tools, and continuity features vary by host. Read the platform guide for the agent you actually use and check what gets written to the local index before feeding it confidential material.
The local plugin is source-available under Elastic License 2.0. Context Mode Gateway is a separate hosted service. To borrow this pattern in Floatboat, keep raw evidence on disk and return compact references with enough context to verify a decision.
Long outputs can stay searchable even when only a few lines go back to the model. Review which tool outputs are indexed and how the agent retrieves details.
Run a command or script and return a focused result while preserving output for later lookup.
Retrieve passages from indexed tool results with an exact error string, test name or source identifier.
Review MCP and hook support for your agent before expecting automatic routing or session recovery.
Pick a noisy workflow and compare the evidence reaching the model. Track both the amount retrieved and whether it is enough to resolve the task.
Return the failed test names and first errors to the agent. Search the saved output for an assertion and its surrounding stack when the first result is insufficient.
Index the fetch results under distinct source names. Retrieve only excerpts relevant to the question and preserve a link back to each original source.
Group errors by compiler message or file before handing them to the model. Keep the full log available to check whether different symptoms share a cause.
On a host with continuity support, test whether the agent can recover previous decisions after compaction. Check the restored summary against a short reference before relying on it.
The local plugin and the hosted Gateway have separate setup and data flows. For a pilot, choose a supported host and use a test project whose outputs can be indexed safely.
Check which MCP tools, hooks and recovery features are available for your agent version.
Review what the index retains, where it is stored and how to remove test data when the pilot ends.
Review ELv2, especially the restrictions on offering the software as a managed service.
Compare the workflows, operating requirements, and source licenses of these projects.